Thursday, April 12, 2007

You can't handle the truth

The root of what I'm trying to say is everything that's going on is being scripted. You have Al-Qaeda working for the intelligence services of western countries. You have intelligence agents, CIA, SAS, Mossad, etc, dressing up as muslims and blowing things up. It's all being 'scripted' to create the environment necessary for the power elite to get what it is they want.

It's all about natural resources as far as the middle east is concerned. Unocal did a feasibility study on the trans-afghan pipeline, but the Taliban weren't going for an American company. They liked the idea but didn't want Americans involved. In 1998, Unocal went before congress and said they couldn't do squat until the Taliban were out of power.

Bush took power and in January 2001, he appointed Condi Rice. In June of the same year, the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued an edict on hijacking policy a mere 3 months before 9/11. Other things aside, getting to the point, Rice had left a 10 year directorship of Chevron to become National Security Advisor.

After 9/11 she was partly responsible for pointing us to Afghanistan. We went to war with them in October 2001. In June 2002, Hamid Karzai became interim President of Afg. Six months later, he put the pipeline project back on the table. At some point, the Asian Development Bank decided it would become one of the major investors for the pipeline.

In January 2005, Bush appointed her Sec. of State, where her powers include negotiating trade contracts with foreign countries like Afghanistan. Then, in August 2005, Chevron bought out Unocal, and it was at around that same time that a refinery complex in Jamnagar, India started steps to double output capacity by 2010, which is around the same timeframe the Afghanistan pipeline is projected to be done.

Now, sometime in mid to late 2006, somewhere between August and October, Chevron just happened to put some money in with the people who own the Jamnagar refinery to build a new refinery. Intially Chevron is going to have 6% ownership of this refinery, but they want to get 29%. Coincidentally, a branch from this trans-afghan pipeline is going to go from Karchi, Pakistan right into this refinery complex in Jamnagar, India, where Chevron is putting its refinery.

Now cutting an even longer story real short, Bush Sr. is a consultant for the Carlyle Group who, among other things, is the largest defense contractor on the planet. They have a market capital of, I think, $40 billion. Included in the Carlyle Group is the Bin Laden's, and Donald Rumsfeld, among others.

Why would Iran want a nuclear weapon ? Perhaps because of Operation Ajax, which led to the overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh, arming and funding Savak, and raping them of their oil wealth. If religion has anything whatever to do with it, it's because the United States created Islamic Extremism in the middle east to persuade the muslims to help fight the Soviets. The US created islamic extremism. Blame your government.

No, they created extremism...they dropped leaflets out of planes saying to fight for allah, etc. No, they created it, and obviously you're illiterate or just thick headed, because I already told you the justification is that the United States has already killed millions of their innocent people.

The US planted the seeds of islamic extremism, it flowered, and those already devoted to that mentality pollinated the entire middle east with the United States' devil seed. After the soviets were conquered, the seeds of islamic extremism were well rooted in the middle east, and they turned against their western oppressors and used the ideology the United States planted in the Middle East as a rally cry. I fail to see how you can say the United States didn't create it.

I don't see why we're going to fight the Iranians and the Iranians are going to fight us. The same people that basically took over Iran and fucked it over is the same people that control the United States and use it as a means to their own ends. So, if the strings attached to the Iranians are being pulled by the same puppet masters pulling the strings attached to us, why fight each other? Why not fight the one's pulling the strings on us all?

Perhaps that just makes too much sense.

I do not have a fanatical view of the world, simply a realistic one. I have concocted no lies here, if you knew shit about history you'd know that. I'm not saying the Iranians have a right to do so, I'm simply saying I can understand why they would. If the Iranians killed millions of our people, do you not think we'd retaliate? Honestly...

I seem to remember something vaguely, like 9/11, when supposedly 19 hijackers killed 3,000 innocent people in our country, which has resulted in the deaths of over 200,000 people in Iraq and Afghanistan. I was right, we would retaliate. So they haven't the right to do so? That's a little hypocritical don't you think?

I don't know, maybe, perhaps, it's CIA and MI6 running around in ski masks, with bombs and things, blowing shit up, and causing the sectarian violence, so it'll justify the occupation in military bases being built with Iraq Reconstruction money. Our governments now have to protect the Iraq oil fields, considering Iraq just gave the western powers 86% control over their them.

AUTHOR UNKNOWN

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home